Denmark: international arbitration to solve commercial disputes

Marcello Mantelli
Avvocato in Milan and Turin

Arbitration as an alternative method of dispute resolution is regulated in Denmark under the Arbitration Act (Act). Adopted in 2005, the Act is largely based on the model provided by the UNCITRAL Regulation on international commercial arbitration, and yet it has some differences with respect to this.

Pursuant to the Danish arbitration law, for example, there is no formal requirement for the conclusion of the agreement between the parties regarding the choice of arbitration as a method of resolving any disputes. Furthermore, the Danish discipline has not been modified and updated in the light of the amendments to the UNCITRAL rules of 2006.

In other words, for example, in Denmark the parties can enter into an arbitration agreement – both before and after the outbreak of a dispute – without having to comply with the requirement of the written form.

However – given the signing by Denmark of the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958) – it must be said that the arbitration agreement, in order to be recognized and enforced in other States party to the Convention outside Denmark, must be in writing.

As regards the determination of the number of arbitrators, the Danish law establishes that this can be freely chosen by the parties within the arbitration agreement. If the parties do not express their opinion on this point, the law establishes a number of three arbitrators: two appointed by each of the parties and the third chosen by the two previously appointed arbitrators.

The choice thus made can only be challenged in the event that there is a risk that one of the appointed arbitrators is not impartial or independent, or in the event that the arbitrator does not possess the specific characteristics for which the parties had selected him.

Once the arbitrators have been appointed, the arbitral tribunal thus formed must issue the award exclusively in writing, together with a copy signed by the arbitrators, which must be delivered to the parties. The award thus issued is final and it is thus possible to proceed with the execution of the same.

Finally, it should be noted that Denmark has also signed the 1965 Washington Convention on disputes relating to foreign investments. Consequently, the Danish legal system complies with and follows the rules provided for by the Convention, establishing an international arbitration mechanism for the resolution of disputes between the investor and the host state of the investment.

For further information on international arbitration, it is possible to refet to the “ABC” on international arbitration on this blog.

#internationalarbitration #Denmarkarbitration #commercialarbitration #focusDenmark #disputeresolution #internationalcontracts #internationaldispute #internationallitigation #internationalsale #internationaldistribution

Condividi su:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Dear Aurelia, the information you have provided are not sufficient for an answer which is subject to a professional engagement. In any case, we should study the provisions of the contract and identify governing law of the contract.If it does not provide anything on governing law then conflict law shall apply (in the most part of the countries likely the governing law will be the law of the country where the agent is domiciled). best regards Marcello Mantelli


I signed a contract with a fashion agency but there were no termination clauses in the contract and decided to withdraw it before one week after signature so sent them an email but after 14 days they sent me an email and asserted that because i didnt withdraw in legal deadlines i have to perform the contract and pay whole money.Noboday told me about any deadlines and nothing was in the contract!! Why did they claim such a thing?


Follow Us